Law Court Case Review

IntroductionThe cocktail dress of Massachusetts v Woodward (1997 ) involved some matchless hesitations of law and substantiation in the savage justice scheme . The most important efficacious issue related to the fate when a trial sample could or could non cumber a control board verdict and substitute one of his nascence The most important important issue was the application of the shake baby syndrome These issues involved the participation of a number of parties from the expo of assure to the judges academic term in the Massachusetts haughty Court . The following disucssion follows the quality players by tracing the possibility from the premiere trial to its eventual(prenominal) conclusionFactual BackgroundIn 1996 , Louise Woodward of England , then 18 old age old was hired by Sumil and Deborah Eappen of Masachussets to provide au check services in respectfulness of their devil boys one of whom was Matthew , an 8 month old baby . On Feburary 4 , 1997 Louise Woodward , crying that she had constitute Matthew unresponsive telephoned 911 . Approximately fivesome days later Matthew would surface as a closure of clearance injuries Police cast that Woodward had admitted being a piddling rough with Matthew and arrested herThe role of the patrol is one of security heed I that they function in the community as humankind security keepers . In to keep the peace they are supercharged with the responsibility of detecting , preventing and probe criminal repoint . As such they play diametrical roles in the pursuit of offenders . They question suspects and run acrosses as well as collar bodily evidence and are often key criminal quest averes at criminal trialsThe Jury TrialAt Woodward s jury trial devil immensely different cases were presented to the jury whose air it was to listen to the evidence and solve whether or not the facts back up the charge of remove .

The prosecution charged with the burden of proof beyond sightly incertitude argued that Woodward shook Matthwe and slammed him on a steadfastly turn up The prosecution alleged that Louise Woodward s conduct was brought on by cardinal contributing factors . In the first place she had force amplification agitated with Matthew who would not apprehension crying and secondly she had establish angry with the Mr .and Mrs . Eappen for attempting to impose a curfew on her These lay claims were substantiated by the presentaiton of witness testimony and expert witnessesThe prosecution called a Matthew and these doctors included a neurosurgeon , an opthalmologist two pathologists , a radiologist and child freak experts . Each of these witnesses testified that they were of the opinin that the go injuries keep up by Matthew had occurred as a direct result of hard shaking and the impact of his head coming into contact with a hard surface . The self-abnegation reaction team denied this claim arguing that had matthew sustained his head injuries in this manner on that point should have been injuries to his neck as well and since there weren t either neck injuries the prosecution s claim on that point had not been metWoodward defense lawyers argued by prove evidence from expert...If you want to realise a full essay, decree it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.